Critically evaluate McGregor’s Theroy X and Theory Y Essay

Critic totallyy mensurate McGregors opening X and possibleness Y. How far is it applicable to commission and employee motivation in contemporary Chinese organizations? In the modern corporation milieu, employees motivation plays a pivotal role, thus they should be recognised as a meaning(a) part of corporations financial assets. There ar several transparent viewpoints of approaches to managerial strategies about motivating employees, one of which is McGregors Theory X and Theory Y. It proposes that providing an autonomous purlieu satisfying employees higher needs is more favorite(a) than simply controlling them by rewards and punishment.This essay will firstly evaluate McGregors speculation. Although influential hold dear of this speculation in organization history might be approved, there are two primary issues, invalidness and superficial recognition, which criticisms revolve around. Subsequently, this essay will discuss the extent of this openings application in Ch inese organizations. Although McGregors theory whitethorn be employed in hardly a(prenominal) corporations, this theory is oecumenically non applicable in most contemporary Chinese organizations.Many theorists halt that McGregors theory considers the ambit of focussing from a brisk angle, indicating a strong influential value. In contrast to the principles of conventional management mentioned as Theory X, the advocated Theory Y illuminated a cluster of new or redefined concepts such as self-fulfilling prophecy and tariff. agree to Carson (2005), virtually of those concepts had been construe before however, McGregors theory combined those concepts emerging from separate theories. found on these compiled conceptions, this theory takes higher-order needs into consideration, which innovatively incloses a profound run short value that management should not only involve controlling and monitoring. Moreover, the inclination to responsibility of employees contributes to partic ipative atmospheres in working environment. Lerner (2011) claims that McGregors theory can prepare employees skills to rein in complicated tasks collectible to their sense of responsibility, in parallel with improving the dominance of an individual.Therefore, this theory, revealing an initial pattern of management strategy, dramatically influences the applied field of organization outgrowth. In spite of the influence and pilot burnerity of McGregors theory, there is a primary drawback of the validity, which is regarding the guess of human character in this theory.This theory is mainly based on an analysis ofhuman nature. McGregor (2000) has pointed out that theory X management assumes that people generally are not responsible for work in contrast to theory Y assuming that people are invariably self-controlled. However, the theory X assumption is exaggeratedly negative art object the theory Y assumption is overly optimistic. According to Bobic and Davis (2003), there is no e vidence that systematically certifies the existence of individuals extreme attitudes towards work. Similarly, Francesco and Gold (2005) argued that human nature is not viewed purely positive or negative in all the cultures, drawing on Hofstedes theory.Furthermore, different employees whitethorn have close to different characteristics however, McGregor blended those sophisticated human natures into two simplistic models to introduce a quite deficient theory. Therefore, the theory seems to be invalid due to this relatively wild and inadequate analysis. In addition to the invalid assumption of McGregors theory, there is another drawback concerning superficial recognition of autonomous environment and authority which are primary principles of Theory Y and Theory X reckonively. McGregor (2000) state that autonomous environment can be acquired by opportunities for self-actualization.Nonetheless, head up (2011) has argued that incentives involving self-actualization are barely effectiv e. Likewise, Bobic and Davis (2003) state that self-actualization is not a pragmatic motivational factor due to the rare opportunity provided by corporations in reality. Although some approaches such as job enrichment can be implemented, managers may not be totally competent to direct this management, which reveals that McGregors theory may overestimate the effectiveness of autonomous environment.Conversely, the model of authority representing Theory X may be a more frequently adopted management tool, which is the contrary to what is portrayed in the theory. Head (2011) pointed out authority sooner than bureaucracy may offer legitimate power and guarantee development of corporations towards certain direction. In fact, offering appropriate guidance to subordinates and essentially avoiding overly vigorous control stand a significant position in most companies. Consequently, McGregors proposal that autonomous environment should be change state on while authority is obsolete may requir e afterthought because of the superficial recognition. Motivational strategies have been considered as an essential concentration for corporations.With respect to the application ofMcGregors theory in mainland China, minimal successful instances may be seen in some extremely large conglomerates. Those conglomerates such as Shanghais corporations hire numerous workers, contributing to competition and contract therefore, employees in these organizations may emphasize higher-order needs because of this particular work circumstance, in accordance with the assumption of McGregors theory. Chan and Wyatt (2007) demonstrate that employees in Shanghais corporations can be significantly actuate by the satisfaction of egoism that is also emphasized in McGregors theory.Hence, it seems that this theory can conjecture its feasibility in few large Chinese organizations. However, generally, McGregors theory reflects low practicability in most contemporary Chinese corporations. According to Ala s (2005), most Chinese respondents are more likely to be encouraged by lower needs satisfaction such as incomes, whereas the dominant principle of McGregors theory is strategies satisfying higher needs. Therefore, Chinese employees concentration on lower needs makes it difficult for them to be motivated by McGregors theory.Moreover, Dessler (2006) argued that employee empowerment, one of the principles of McGregors theory, is excluded from Chinese corporations. Furthermore, McGregors theory is incompatible with the comparatively ingrained Confucian value system in Chinese culture. According to Geren (2011), an abandoned principle in the theory is obedience for authority which is the essence of Confucian value system. Chinese employees largely gracious in the atmosphere of Confucian value may be uncomfortable with the management of McGregors theory. Emphasis on lower needs and the ethnic of Confucian value system are both opposite to McGregors theory.Therefore, this theory is not applicable in most contemporary Chinese organizations. As a whole, McGregors theory may animate original spirit of motivation management nevertheless, its invalidity is directly resulted from inadequate and unrealistic assumption of human nature. Additionally, excessively focusing on autonomous environment and ignoring efficiency of authority may indicate the superficial recognition in this theory. These two drawbacks can describe for ineffective arrangement. As motivation management develops globally, in China, in spite of efficient application in few conglomerates, McGregors theory is not compatible with most Chinese organizations because general Chinese condition is the obstacle to successfully adopting this theory.There is no public theory hence, in order to improve the effectiveness of management, organizations should utilize distinct management principles flexibly in specific working circumstance. discussion account 1079Reference ListAlas, R. (2008) Attitudes and values in C hinese manufacturing companies a likeness with Japanese, South Korean and Hong Kong companies. Chinese management Studies. Vol. 2(1), pp.32-51 (PDF available)Bobic, M.P. & Davis, W.E. (2003) A Kind Word for Theory X Or Why So Many raw focussing Techniques Quickly Fail. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. Vol. 13(3), pp.239-264 (PDF available)Carson, C.M. (2005) A historical view of Douglas McGregors Theory Y. Management Decision. Vol. 43(3), pp.450-460 (PDF available)Chan, K.W. & Wyatt, T.A. (2007) Quality of put to work Life A Study of Employees in Shanghai, China. Asia Pacific Business Review. Vol. 13(4), pp.501-517 (PDF available)Dessler, G. (2006) Expanding into China? What foreign employers should know about human resource management in China today. SAM Advanced Management Journal. Vol.71(4), pp.11-24 (PDF available)Francesco, A.M. & Gold, B.A. (2005) International Organizational Behavior. second ed. NJ, USA Pearson Education (PDF available of relevant ch apter)Geren, B. (2011) Motivation Chinese theoretical Perspectives. Journal of Behavioural Studies in Business. Vol.3, pp.1-10 (PDF available)Head, T.C. (2011) Douglas McGregors legacy lessons learned, lessons lost. Journal of Management History. Vol. 17(2), pp.202-216 (PDF available)Lerner, A. (2011) McGregors legacy thoughts on what he left, what transpired, and what remains to pursue. Journal of Management History. Vol. 17(2), pp.217 237 (PDF available)McGregor, D. (2000) The Human Side of Enterprise. Reflections The Society for Organizational Learning Journal. Vol. 2(1), pp.6-15. (PDF available)