Rather the officials should have spoken

In the essay the author is attempting to protect the rights of justify terminology through persuasion rather than through threats and intimidations. In promoting his views, the author cites the pattern of an incident that took place at Harvard.It is the authors contention that the university officials should non reach enforced their rules on the offending students. Rather the officials should puzzle verbalise with the students in order to help them understand the effect that their execute would have on the rest of the community. In developing his perspective, the author brings to cleverness the quandary that the first amendment presents in throw overboarding much(prenominal) displays. even the author also suggests a counseling out. He is asking the university officials not to enforce any diversity of rules on much(prenominal) displays.It is his contention that such a course of action entrust only generate more interest in such behaviors and therefore a vicious cycle will result. In different words, the author is suggesting that the university official should not pee-pee too much promotion in dealing with such an issue.The authors break up in the essay is to explore the different tracks in which arguments over free speech can be resolved. The incident that he mentions has to do with any(prenominal) students hanging a confederate flagstone in view.The First Amendment permits this. However it offends other members of the community. Therefore this is a difficult issue to resolve. On the 1 hand, university officials should not restrict the expression of free speech. On the other hand, they cannot allow freedom of speech to offend other members of the community.The author also mentions that both(prenominal) communities have enacted codes to resolve such positionings while others have refused to impose such restrictions. The authors purpose in this essay is to find a middle way. This is because enacting codes will only generate more interest in the area so that people will resort to more utmost(a) forms of free speech.Refusing to impose restrictions will also not solve the caper because in this case the rights of free speech will be abused. The purpose of the author in this essay is to suggest a different way in which the issues raised can be resolved.In promoting his views, the author is citing examples of an incident that occurred at Harvard. This incident forms the core of this essay. Resolving the issues raised in this situation forms the building of the essay. In developing the structure, the author draws upon the First Amendment to resolve the issue.However he brings to light how the First Amendment fails to resolve the situation that arose at Harvard. Therefore he argues for a greater level of communication with the students in order to help them settle for themselves whether what they did was right or wrong. The author believes that this is the only way for the university officials to resolve the situation w ith the minimum of publicity.The author believes that the publicity that will result from enforcing restrictions will have the opposite effect. Therefore the university officials should try to resolve the issue internally by lecture to the students. In presenting his views, the author argued the validity of imposing restrictions when such restrictions will only create more interest in the problem.The author clearly sympathizes with the students right to do what they did. However he seeks to communicate the importance of talking to the students in order to help them understand why what they could be considered subversive. He brings to light the fact that the students are clearly in their rights to hang the flag as it is permitted by the First Amendment.However he also argues over the incorrectness of this action. He advises against enforcing restrictions. He believes that this will only create more cognizance of this problem so that other students will be interested to create sim ilar situations.Clearly it is in the university officials interest to minimize the number of these incidents and to that end, the university officials should resolve such situations privately by discussing the issues with the students.Therefore the author seeks to find a third way other than enforcing codes or doing nothing. In this respect, he stresses the importance of maintaining the balance amidst free speech and mutual respect. He says that this objective can be met through education and persuasion.